Re: Extropic art: symbolism, interpretation & association

Natasha V. More (
Sat, 15 Mar 1997 16:46:38 -0700 (MST)

At 03:53 PM 3/15/97 -0700, Tony wrote:

>>According to the defection of Extropic Art, the art is extropic. Basic.
>Do you really mean "defection?" If you use this word again, be very careful
>you don't accidentally insert an "a" between the "c" and the "t".
>Just joking! :-)

Very clever! No, I meant "definition" and assumed you could figure it out.

>I think your work is very good really, majestic and enobling.
>Beware of hubris, though.

As in, "There is no safety in unlimited technological hubris" (McGeorge Bundy)?

This is a good point, especially technological aspect of transhumanism.