<<
> "A story will appear in Science, Nature, or the New York Times, stating
> that biologist Peter Duesberg is receiving increased respect in the
> scientific community for his view that AIDS is not caused by HIV." >>
That would not work. IMO you need HIV to be 100% proven wrong as even one
single cause of AIDS . . . that is . . . to satisfy Duesberg's claim that HIV
has no role, not one, 100% _no_ role in causing _any_ form of AIDS.
He says HIV is 100% on the wrong track.