From: Eugene Leitl (Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 04:20:46 MST
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Harvey Newstrom wrote:
> I believe this is why most technical experts have dropped off the list
> and no longer participate. Sometimes I think there is more
This is unnecessarily harsh. ROI on a well researched post is negligable
given that most of us are busy professionally. On the long run this tends
to conversation level discussion.
> pseudo-science on this list than most. I wonder how many real
> scientists or engineers there are compared to how many science-fiction
> readers who think real science is like what they read about.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 13:37:39 MST