From: Smigrodzki, Rafal (SmigrodzkiR@msx.upmc.edu)
Date: Wed Feb 06 2002 - 22:01:42 MST
Robert J. Bradbury [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] wrote:
Clearly GH is not the "one answer" -- provided people realize that and
carefully balance risks and benefits, I do not think they should be
prevented from using it.
### Oh, of course I agree here - if somebody believes in laetrile or GH,
he/she should be able to buy it from willing vendors. Down with the FDA!
Although, on the other hand, an FDA-lite might be useful, without the right
to ban a substance but with the authority to force labeling and warnings on
At the same time it would be useful for
physicians to generate a meta-database of results based on such
individuals who are willing to treat themselves as "experimental vehicles".
Ultimately one wants to tie it back to genetic and lifestyle data so
one can determine when GH is likely to help more than it hurts.
### Good idea.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 13:37:38 MST