From: Adrian Tymes (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jan 29 2002 - 22:59:57 MST
Phil Osborn wrote:
> Well, for starters, what about a universal social contract???
You're thinking a bit too high level. The warlords my problem is about
would never sign such a contract. They are not (directly) interested in
the welfare of their people; they're in it for themselves. Even if they
did sign, they'd often as not ignore it once those who pressured them
into signing have turned their attentions elsewhere.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 13:37:37 MST