From: Smigrodzki, Rafal (SmigrodzkiR@msx.upmc.edu)
Date: Tue Jan 22 2002 - 09:46:19 MST
Eugene Leitl [mailto:Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Harvey Newstrom wrote:
> Even on this list I would guess that less than half are signed up for
> cryonics, less than half practice calorie restriction, less than half
> have a consistent nutrient program, and less than half have regular
Currently, cryonics is the most irrelevant part of the above, unless
you're lucky, or live in the right place.
### I wouldn't agree here - cryonics is very important, to the the point
where changing citzenship and localization might be beneficial if needed to
improve access. Even the healthiest of us have a significant risk of sudden
death. While good nutrition and other parts of the regime matter, they
usually do not address the short-term risk. If the Singularity comes as
predicted in 2006, this is all the risk that matters.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 13:37:36 MST