From: J Corbally (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Jan 18 2002 - 19:21:17 MST
>Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:06:31 -0500
>From: Mike Lorrey <email@example.com>
>Subject: Re: all the pretty horses
>Damien Broderick wrote:
> > At 04:17 PM 1/16/02 -0800, Loree wrote:
> > >P.S. I read in the Mike Mailway column yesterday <
> > >http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/mailway/article.asp?id=54180
> > >that it is against the law to paint your house in
> > >Vermont. Is that true?
> > Your *horse*.
> > A horse of quite a different color.
>No, you can paint your horse if you want to, your cow as well, mostly to
>distinguish them from deer, since flatlander hunters from Massachusetts
>and New York seem to have difficulty delineating between them. Most
>people, though, buy fluorescent orange vests for their livestock.
Hmmm... gives a whole new meaning to the term "undercoat".
Isn't this what G.E. is for? I want my pwetty purple spotted pony, damnit.
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and
crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures
to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid."
-Q, Star Trek:TNG episode 'Q Who'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 13:37:35 MST