Date: Thu Jan 10 2002 - 12:52:32 MST
Brian Williams writes:
> I took your invitation at face value, and pointed out that my
> (theoretical) children were certainly entitled to their own
> beliefs/politics, and it was essentially none of my business.
Actually you said,
: Then clearly the intelligence enhancement was a failure, give Greg
: Burch or one of his associates a call.
: Like I said if he goes in for intelligence enhancement and comes
: out socialist, sue the doctor.
So it seems that you reject the premise of the thought experiment.
You think it is impossible that a more intelligent person could be
> But you also were making a claim, which you even tried to defend,
> the notion that the smarter you are the more likely you are to
> believe in socialism.
Actually I said,
: It's not implausible: in
: fact in many of the most difficult and esoteric branches of science and
: mathematics, branches which require the highest levels of sheer abstract
: intelligence to thrive, Socialism and allied political philosophies
: are widespread.
I said that the thought experiment was "not implausible", in an attempt
to forestall the very objection that you raised, which was that it was
impossible. I am certainly not saying what you attribute to me, "that
the smarter you are the more likely you are to believe in socialism."
I was just trying to get past your knee jerk reaction in order to get
you to take the thought experiment seriously.
Obviously I failed. Your ideology has successfully defended itself by
keeping you from seriously considering alternatives. I congratulate it.
It rides you masterfully. I hope the bit is comfortable in your mouth.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 13:37:33 MST