From: Joe Dees (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Jan 03 2002 - 04:15:03 MST
How Islam Lost Its Way
Yesterday's Achievements Were Golden; Today, Reason Has Been Eclipsed
By Pervez Amir Ali Hoodbhoy
Sunday, December 30, 2001; Page B04
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- If the world is to be spared what future historians
may call the "century of terror," we will have to chart a perilous course
between the Scylla of American imperial arrogance and the Charybdis of
Islamic religious fanaticism. Through these waters, we must steer by a
distant star toward a careful, reasoned, democratic, humanistic and secular
future. Otherwise, shipwreck is certain.
For nearly four months now, leaders of the Muslim community in the United
States, and even President Bush, have routinely asserted that Islam is a
religion of peace that was hijacked by fanatics on Sept. 11.
These two assertions are simply untrue.
First, Islam -- like Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism or any other
religion -- is not about peace. Nor is it about war. Every religion is about
absolute belief in its own superiority and the divine right to impose its
version of truth upon others. In medieval times, both the Crusades and the
Jihads were soaked in blood. Today, there are Christian fundamentalists who
attack abortion clinics in the United States and kill doctors; Muslim
fundamentalists who wage their sectarian wars against each other; Jewish
settlers who, holding the Old Testament in one hand and Uzis in the other,
burn olive orchards and drive Palestinians off their ancestral land; and
Hindus in India who demolish ancient mosques and burn down churches.
The second assertion is even further off the mark. Even if Islam had, in
some metaphorical sense, been hijacked, that event did not occur three
months ago. It was well over seven centuries ago that Islam suffered a
serious trauma, the effects of which refuse to go away.
Where do Muslims stand today? Note that I do not ask about Islam; Islam is
an abstraction. Maulana Abdus Sattar Edhi, Pakistan's preeminent social
worker, and the Taliban's Mohammad Omar are both followers of Islam, but the
former is overdue for a Nobel Peace Prize while the latter is an ignorant,
psychotic fiend. Palestinian writer Edward Said, among others, has
insistently pointed out that Islam holds very different meaning for
different people. Within my own family, hugely different kinds of Islam are
practiced. The religion is as heterogeneous as those who believe and follow
it. There is no "true Islam."
[Odd - surely one of the more interesting facts about Islam is that it has
retained a remarkable degree of homogeneity irrespective of cultural
variation, and has largely avoided the fragmentation undergone by
Christianity, whose history is essentially one of schism -RR]
Today, Muslims number 1 billion. Of the 48 countries with a full or near
Muslim majority, none has yet evolved a stable democratic political system.
In fact, all Muslim countries are dominated by self-serving corrupt elites
who cynically advance their personal interests and steal resources from
their people. None of these countries has a viable educational system or a
university of international stature.
Reason, too, has been waylaid.
You will seldom see a Muslim name as you flip through scientific journals,
and if you do, the chances are that this person lives in the West. There are
a few exceptions: Pakistani Abdus Salam, together with Americans Steven
Weinberg and Sheldon Glashow, won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1979. I got
to know Salam reasonably well; we even wrote a book preface together. He was
a remarkable man, terribly in love with his country and his religion. And
yet he died deeply unhappy, scorned by Pakistan, declared a non-Muslim by an
act of the Pakistani parliament in 1974. Today the Ahmadi sect, to which
Salam belonged, is considered heretical and harshly persecuted. (My
next-door neighbor, an Ahmadi physicist, was shot in the neck and heart and
died in my car as I drove him to the hospital seven years ago. His only
fault was to have been born into the wrong sect.)
Though genuine scientific achievement is rare in the contemporary Muslim
world, pseudo-science is in generous supply. A former chairman of my
department has calculated the speed of heaven: He maintains it is receding
from Earth at one centimeter per second less than the speed of light. His
ingenious method relies upon a verse inthe Islamic holy book, which says
that worship on the night on whichthe book was revealed is worth a thousand
nights of ordinary worship. He states that this amounts to a time-dilation
factor of 1,000, which he puts into a formulaof Einstein's theory of special
A more public example: One of two Pakistani nuclear engineers recently
arrested on suspicion of passing nuclear secrets to the Taliban had earlier
proposed to solve Pakistan's energy problems by harnessing the power of
genies. He relied on the Islamic belief that God created man from clay, and
angels and genies from fire; so this highly placed engineer proposed to
capture the genies and extract their energy.
Today's sorry situation contrasts starkly with the Islam of yesterday.
Between the 9th and 13th centuries -- the Golden Age of Islam -- the only
people doing decent work in science, philosophy or medicine were Muslims.
Muslims not only preserved ancient learning, they also made substantial
innovations. The loss of this tradition has proven tragic for Muslim
Science flourished in the Golden Age of Islam because of a strong
rationalist and liberal tradition, carried on by a group of Muslim thinkers
known as the Mutazilites.
But in the 12th century, Muslim orthodoxy reawakened, spearheaded by the
Arab cleric Imam Al-Ghazali. Al-Ghazali championed revelation over reason,
predestination over free will. He damned mathematics as being against Islam,
an intoxicant of the mind that weakened faith.
Caught in the viselike grip of orthodoxy, Islam choked. No longer would
Muslim, Christian and Jewish scholars gather and work together in the royal
courts. It was the end of tolerance, intellect and science in the Muslim
world. The last great Muslim thinker, Abd-al Rahman Ibn Khaldun, belonged to
the 14th century.
Meanwhile, the rest of the world moved on. The Renaissance brought an
explosion of scientific inquiry in the West. This owed much totranslations
of Greek works carried out by Arabs and other Muslim contributions, but they
were to matter little. Mercantile capitalism and technological progress
drove Western countries -- in ways that were often brutal and at times
genocidal -- to rapidly colonize the Muslim world from Indonesia to Morocco.
It soon became clear, at least to some of the Muslim elites, that they were
paying a heavy price for not possessing the analytical tools of modern
science and the social and political values of modern culture -- the real
source of power of their colonizers.
Despite widespread resistance from the orthodox, the logic of modernity
found 19th-century Muslim adherents. Some seized on the modern idea of the
nation-state. It is crucial to note that not a single Muslim nationalist
leader of the 20th century was a fundamentalist.
However, Muslim and Arab nationalism, part of a larger anti-colonial
nationalist current across the Third World, included the desire to control
and use national resources for domestic benefit. The conflict with Western
greed was inevitable. The imperial interests of Britain, and later the
United States, feared independent nationalism. Anyone willing to collaborate
was preferred, even the ultraconservative Islamic regime of Saudi Arabia. In
1953, Mohammed Mosaddeq of Iran was overthrown in a CIA coup, replaced by
Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Britain targeted Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser.
Indonesia's Sukarno was replaced by Suharto after a bloody coup that left
hundreds of thousands dead.
Pressed from outside, corrupt and incompetent from within, secular Muslim
governments proved unable to defend national interests or deliver social
justice. They began to frustrate democracy to preserve their positions of
power and privilege. These failures left a vacuum that Islamic religious
movements grew to fill -- in Iran, Pakistan and Sudan, to name a few.
The lack of scruple and the pursuit of power by the United States combined
fatally with this tide in the Muslim world in 1979, when the Soviet Union
invaded Afghanistan. With Pakistan's Mohammed Zia ul-Haq as America's
foremost ally, the CIA openly recruited Islamic holy warriors from Egypt,
Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Algeria. Radical Islam went into overdrive as its
superpower ally and mentor funneled support to the mujaheddin; Ronald Reagan
feted them on the White House lawn.
The rest is by now familiar: After the Soviet Union collapsed, the United
States walked away from an Afghanistan in shambles. The Taliban emerged;
Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda made Afghanistan their base.
What should thoughtful people infer from this whole narrative?
For Muslims, it is time to stop wallowing in self-pity: Muslims are not
helpless victims of conspiracies hatched by an all-powerful, malicious West.
The fact is that the decline of Islamic greatness took place long before the
age of mercantile imperialism. The causes were essentially internal.
Therefore Muslims must be introspective and ask what went wrong.
Muslims must recognize that their societies are far larger, more diverse and
complex than the small homogeneous tribal society in Arabia 1,400 years ago.
It is therefore time to renounce the idea that Islam can survive and prosper
only in an Islamic state run according to sharia, or Islamic law. Muslims
need a secular and democratic state that respects religious freedom and
human dignity and is founded on the principle that power belongs to the
people. This means confronting and rejecting the claim by orthodox Islamic
scholars that, in an Islamic state, sovereignty belongs to the vice-regents
of Allah, or Islamic jurists, not to the people.
Muslims must not look to the likes of bin Laden; such people have no real
answer and can offer no real positive alternative. To glorify their
terrorism is a hideous mistake: The unremitting slaughter of Shiites,
Christians and Ahmadis in their places of worship in Pakistan, and of other
minorities in other Muslim countries, is proof that all terrorism is not
about the revolt of the dispossessed.
The United States, too, must confront bitter truths. The messages of George
W. Bush and Tony Blair fall flat while those of bin Laden, whether he lives
or dies, resonate strongly across the Muslim world. Bin Laden's religious
extremism turns off many Muslims, but they find his political message easy
to relate to: The United States must stop helping Israel in dispossessing
the Palestinians, stop propping up corrupt and despotic regimes across the
world just because they serve U.S. interests.
Americans will also have to accept that their triumphalism and disdain for
international law are creating enemies everywhere, not just among Muslims.
Therefore they must become less arrogant and more like other peoples of this
Our collective survival lies in recognizing that religion is not the
solution; neither is nationalism. We have but one choice: the path of
secular humanism, based upon the principles of logic and reason. This alone
offers the hope of providing everybody on this globe with the right to life,
liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Pervez Hoodbhoy is a professor of nuclear and high-energy physics at
Quaid-e-Azam University in Islamabad.
Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 13:37:32 MST