In a message dated 2/27/01 5:12:06 PM, email@example.com writes:
>Why would anybody want to risk a shock from a dominance-
>enforcement cattleprod by facing somebody like Minsky in the
>flesh, wide open to that high-bandwidth primate social signalling?
Hypothetically, it does allow issues to be raised in a way that forces
them to be addressed. At scientific conferences, usually real questions
provoke honest answers or at least "we'll have to tackle this over lunch".
At Foresight, I would expect presenters to be in "conference mode".
Deploying dominance strategies works in the sense that the targets
leave the mike, but in a conference setting makes the audience tend
to think the speaker is wrong. The exception, of course, is when
everybody already thinks the questioner is a nut.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:48 MDT