>Brian D Williams wrote:
>I'm curious as to what you saw that was unfair about the
>An admission that a measurement has an error, and the realization
>that a measurement without an error bar wouldn't survive even a
>trace of peer scrutiny. That apart from the obvious cases of
>"candidate A won" or "candidate B won" or "candidate C won"
>there's also "within the error margins, we can't tell, so it's a
>tie", and a procedere for resolving such. As flipping an unbiased
>coin, or a public duel, or whatever.
Excellent,I like the part about a resolution if within the margin
of error. There are of course varios tie breaking methods If it had
come to that.
>Apart from that, anything with a "democracy" somewhere in it is
>supposed to represent the meaning of majority of voters. Not
>representatives of such, or some d'Hondtian games with numbers.
>Not to open the can of worms of basis democracy vs. elitism...
Sadly the idea that we are a "democracy" is little more than a
shared delusion, the U.S. is in fact a republic at least at the
Extropy Institute, www.extropy.org
Adler Planetarium www.adlerplanetarium.org
Life Extension Foundation, www.lef.org
National Rifle Association, www.nra.org, 1.800.672.3888
Ameritech Data Center Chicago, IL, Local 134 I.B.E.W
sheesh, that's various of course...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:47 MDT