Although I admire Richard Dawking's forthright
atheistic - - and anti-religiosity -- stance on UK
TV, I have always had trouble making any sense of
his second-order, purely linguistic "meme" notion.
Is there any evidential studies backing up his claims
how memes operate, and if so what is the verdict?
Meme-propaganda uses (if there are any) also seem
to fall well short of the power offered by MVT combined
with human-era hypnosis knowledge ..... the "all-conquering"
versus "the warring memes" or any other philosophical theory.
I guess the only way to test this is to set them both into action
and sees which comes through .... MVT, dharma of this day.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:46 MDT