Correction, was Re: No US Federal parole, was Re: Say what? was Re: true abundance?

From: Michael M. Butler (butler@comp-lib.org)
Date: Mon Jan 29 2001 - 07:44:11 MST

Next message: Michael Lorrey: "Re: Phony deregulation - Fwd: James Bennett's UPI Columnfor01-26-01"
Previous message: artillo5@cs.com: "Optimist's Credo"
In reply to: Michael M. Butler: "No US Federal parole, was Re: Say what? was Re: true abundance?"
Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: No US Federal parole, was Re: Say what? was Re: true abundance?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sorry, make that "No parole for any civilian offenders....every civilian
federal prisoner, or near enough..."

"Michael M. Butler" wrote:
>
> No parole for any federal offenders for 16 years now and counting. Ergo
> every federal prisoner, or near enough, would wind up there.

Next message: Michael Lorrey: "Re: Phony deregulation - Fwd: James Bennett's UPI Columnfor01-26-01"
Previous message: artillo5@cs.com: "Optimist's Credo"
In reply to: Michael M. Butler: "No US Federal parole, was Re: Say what? was Re: true abundance?"
Next in thread: Samantha Atkins: "Re: No US Federal parole, was Re: Say what? was Re: true abundance?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:26 MDT