Heinlein and strong women

From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Mon Jan 29 2001 - 04:08:42 MST

Next message: John Marlow: "Re: selling an idea"
Previous message: John Marlow: "Re: Say what? was Re: true abundance?"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: true abundance?"
Next in thread: Michael Lorrey: "Re: true abundance?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 12:24 AM 29/01/01 -0800, samantha wrote:

>He had strong female
>characters long before it was at all fashionable. His male and female
>characters are strongly sexual.

Yes, Boss. Thank you, dear <meek but mutinous look>

Oh wait. That would only work in Heinlein mode if I were a female
addressing a male. Oh hangnails! Snel-frockey! *Spit!*

Damien Broderick

Next message: John Marlow: "Re: selling an idea"
Previous message: John Marlow: "Re: Say what? was Re: true abundance?"
In reply to: Samantha Atkins: "Re: true abundance?"
Next in thread: Michael Lorrey: "Re: true abundance?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:26 MDT