On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 05:18:38PM -0500, Michael S. Lorrey wrote:
> However, under the pretext of the novel, all non-Alphas were as they
> were *by design*.
Yup. The first priority of the world government is *stability*. So once
they've got a working system, they modify people to fit the system, not
(Note that it wasn't written as a utopia.)
> .... This theoretical concept of a fully alpha'd
> society supported completely by an automated society of robots was
> posited in the end but untested (what had been tested was the idea of
> Alphas filling every position in society, including drudgework
> positions). Huxley could not extrapolate this accurately because such a
> society has never occured before.
I think he did pretty well for 1939 ...
> While your 'short step' is something a luddite would accuse an extropian
> of, we'd rather advocate that everyone receive genetic therapy in the
> womb to maximize all potentials
Hint: I don't disagree with you here. (Shameless self-publicity: I just
sold a couple of novellas to Asimov's SF magazine that, among other things,
touch on just this theme ...)
>(as well as mandate that those that
> choose to use their bodies as person manufacturing facilities behave in
> compliance with OSHA regulations: i.e. no smoking, exposure to smoke or
> other toxic substances like alchohol, drugs, etc.) I'm for maximizing
> liberty, including that of the occupant of that person manufacturing
AOOGA! AOOGA! DANGER, WILL ROBINSON! ABORTION FLAMEFEST LOOMING! CHANGE COURSE!
> Optimally its rights should not be any less important than the
I'll agree with the "optimally". In practice, that ain't going to happen
until pregnancy is a 100% *deliberately incurred* condition -- prerequisites
for which I see as including (a) very cheap, totally effective, safe
contraception, and (b) universal sex education.
(I assume that you're not advocating banning abortion at this time. Are you?)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:19 MDT