On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Harvey Newstrom wrote:
> John Marlow <email@example.com> wrote,
> >Why not try to figure out why the monkeys DON'T get
> >the symptoms and try to apply THAT to humans?
> I think this makes a lot more sense! Instead of putting human genes
> that cause disease into monkeys, we should be putting monkey genes
> that prevent disease into humans! (And maybe a little of that
> glow-juice, too!)
i'm not so sure. intuitively, it seems to me that studying why an
organism *doesn't* get a disease is much more difficule than studying why
it *does*. for one thing, putting a gene in and seeing what changes makes
for easily controled experiments, whereas studying why it *doesn't* do
something requires investigating the entire system -- hundreds of
thousands of genes, emergent properties, etc.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:19 MDT