Re: Oh no! or why the future won't accomadate everyone

From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Sat Mar 18 2000 - 21:04:05 MST

Next message: hal@finney.org: "Re: EVOLUTION: Stress needed for diversity?"
Previous message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Brin story in Nature"
In reply to: Robert Owen: "Re: Oh no! or why the future won't accomadate everyone"
Next in thread: Robert Owen: "Re: Oh no! or why the future won't accomadate everyone"
Reply: Robert Owen: "Re: Oh no! or why the future won't accomadate everyone"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Robert Owen wrote:
>
> "The human take on God and the afterlife" should be treated as a problem??

If it's wrong, yes. There are dozens of human 'takes' which make
factual assertions about the state of the Universe, at most one of which
can be correct. The others are 'problems', like any other set of false theories.

-- 
       sentience@pobox.com      Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
          http://pobox.com/~sentience/beyond.html
                 Member, Extropy Institute
           Senior Associate, Foresight Institute

Next message: hal@finney.org: "Re: EVOLUTION: Stress needed for diversity?"
Previous message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: Brin story in Nature"
In reply to: Robert Owen: "Re: Oh no! or why the future won't accomadate everyone"
Next in thread: Robert Owen: "Re: Oh no! or why the future won't accomadate everyone"
Reply: Robert Owen: "Re: Oh no! or why the future won't accomadate everyone"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:05:47 MDT