Any thoughts on this anyone?
----- Original Message -----
From: Taylor, John (JH) <JohnH.Taylor@sasol.com>
To: 'lloyd' <lloyd@A-ALBIONIC.COM>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 1:55 AM
Subject: The Political Mauling of Darwin
Evolutionary theory today is dominated by
the old left wing of politics which is
fighting a rear guard action against today's
new right view. In previous years, evolutionary
theory was dominated by the old right wing.
Both are dishonest twisters of scientific
truth that have mauled Darwinism beyond
recognition. No scientific idea in the
whole history of science has ever had
such an impact on human politics so
that this mauling becomes inevitable.
Political correctness today pivots on organism
fitness altruism. This event, that is not predicted
within Darwinism to ever be observed in nature,
and has never been confirmed as any observation in
nature, is just accepted without question without
any clear definitions of what it is, because the
old left sensibility favors it. Dawkins is
a paid mouthpiece of such a biased establishment
and is providing masses of propaganda for public
consumption, that now fuels a multi million
dollar industry worldwide. Most of the
paid work within Neo Darwinism research is
public funded. These people, rightly
or wrongly, feel their jobs are under threat
from new right politics. After the failure of
group selection to establish organism fitness
altruism within nature, the focus of selection
logic was lowered to the gene level, but
not entirely. Dawkins selfish genes were
still reproducing themselves in organism
generations and not within gene generations.
Thus the false logic was born that selfish
genes provide altruistic organisms in nature
where organism altruism was now saved within
Darwinism. This entire logic is not self consistent
but yet another biased fabrication to now support
organism fitness altruism in nature. Now people can
suppose that if its good enough for nature then
it's natural for politics to insist that people
act in an altruistic manner within human societies.
Before WW2 the exact opposite fabrication was
put in place to support racism and Hitler.
Here unnatural selection replaced Darwinian
natural selection and selfish organisms meant
the extermination of unfit races by intent.
Natural selection is only competition by
default between freely competing adult
organisms.
Darwinism does not support any selfish or
altruistic organisms. It predicts that
all organisms form mutual but not necessarily
equal associations for fitness benefit, period.
The old left can't stand "but not necessarily
equal" and the old right cannot stand "mutual"
where both their fabrications of Darwinism act
to destroy freedom of individual choice
and strengthen ancient tribal totalitarianism
sensibilities that lie dormant in everybody
IMHO.
Both fabrications:
1) Were public funded within scientific
establishments.
2) Failed to define Darwinian fitness and use it
in any self consistent way.
3) Had huge negative impacts on human social
structures.
John Edser
Independent Researcher
PO Box 266
Church Point
NSW 2105
Australia
***********************************
James Daugherty, Internet Postmaster for A-albionic Research (POB 20273,
Ferndale, MI 48220), a ruling class/conspiracy research resource for the
entire political-ideological spectrum. Quarterly journal, book sales,
rare/out-of-print searches, New Paradigms Discussion List, Weekly Up-date
Lists & E-text Archive of research, intelligence, catalogs, & resources.
To Discuss Ideas:
mailto:lloyd@a-albionic.com http://msen.com/~lloyd/
For Ordering Info & Free Catalog:
mailto:james@a-albionic.com http://a-albionic.com/
**FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <http://a-albionic.com/search.html> **
Explore Our Archive: <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html>
***********************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:05:29 MDT