EvMick@aol.com wrote:
> A short while ago there was a discussion concerning orbital towers....earth
> to geosych. The asertion was made that using a novel approach and hi tech
> materials such a structure was possible with today's tech.
Ja and I disagree, at least on earth. I havent gone over the
equations in the paper that Robert B. referenced, and I really
need to do so when I get the chance, but my calcs suggest we
arent there yet, and I havent found an error in those calcs.
Yet. {8^D
Mars would be good for an isosynchronous cable tho.
> If a twenty thousand mile hi structure is possible then how much more
> possible is a two or three hundred mile high structure?
One was in tension, the other compression. Not directly comparable.
> More to the point....how useful would such a structure be?
Useful. We would think of uses.
> Power Generation. Being that high there must be some voltage differential
> between ground level and the top...out of the atmosphere.
Sure would. That unsuccessful experiment with the shuttle where
they tried to reel out a long cable in orbit to generate power was
to show just this effect. spike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:05:29 MDT