Zero Powers wrote:
> >From: Doug Jones <email@example.com>
> >Zero Powers wrote:
> > >
> > > Can there be enough hateful cartoons about an organization that fights
> > > keep more guns than people in circulation?
> >Not at the expense of rational discourse about the real problems and
> >solutions- if gun rights activists are painted as violent antisocial
> >irrational paranoid maniacs (the general drift of that cartoon), that
> >makes it difficult to calmly analyze the situation.
> Political satire is long recognized as a valuable tool in the social tool
> kit. However I don't think there is any danger of cartoons preventing
> rational discourse among those who prefer to seek it out.
> >Your phrase, "an organization that fights to keep more guns than people
> >in circulation" is obviously pejorative and not conducive to polite
> >disagreement. Please reconsider using such language.
> I politely disagree. A statement of fact, no matter how blunt, is neither
> pejorative nor inconducive to polite disagreement. If I had called the NRA
> and its sympathizers "violent antisocial irrational paranoid maniacs,"
> *that* would be pejorative. If my quoted phrase offends your sensibilities,
> I would suggest that you are ill prepared to engage in any passionate
Since there are more people in the US than guns, then it is hardly a statement
of fact. Since there are more people in the world than guns in the world, it is
also not a statement of fact. A statement of fact would be,"an organization that
fights to maintain every law abiding American's right to own as many or as few
guns as they wish." That would be a statement of fact as well as
Michael S. Lorrey Director, Grafton County Fish & Game Assoc. http://www.lorrey.com/gcfga/ Member, Extropy Institute http://www.extropy.org Member, National Rifle Association http://www.nra.org "Live Free or Die, Death is not the Worst of Evils." - General John Stark
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:05:03 MDT