James Swayze wrote:
> Anders Sandberg wrote:
> > If the transition to nanotech is sufficiently slow rules and rulers
> > might keep up, but to actually control something like that is likely just
> > as hard as controlling the Internet.
> > If the
> > transition is faster than they can keep up with, something that seems to
> > have happened for most other radical technologies (computers, genetic
> > engineering etc) then they will not be in any position to instate working
> > controls anyway.
> Provided we keep our current system of government. Can anyone envision a
> system capable of keeping up?
I suspect that an internet-based meritocracy would be able to handle the
changes. That assumes of course, that the many problems of choosing the
best person for a job in an unbiased way can be overcome. I'm beginning to
think that the problems are solveable though.
-- Stirling Westrup | Use of the Internet by this poster email@example.com | is not to be construed as a tacit | endorsement of Western Technological | Civilization or its appurtenances.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:04:44 MDT