Re: Clinton's National Nanotechnology Initiative

From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Tue Feb 29 2000 - 00:13:35 MST

Next message: Eugene Leitl: "RE: Charles Platt responds to Billy Brown on CryoNet Message #13281"
Previous message: Max More: "Messenger of Knowledge (the Internet in Indian villages)"
In reply to: Zero Powers: "Re: Clinton's National Nanotechnology Initiative"
Next in thread: Michael Wiik: "Re: Clinton's National Nanotechnology Initiative"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Zero Powers wrote:
>
> I tend to vote for the liar who is saying what I want to hear and just hope
> s/he is lying about something else.

This system strikes me as being somewhat subject to abuse. Hint: Some
politicians lie more than others. Does the phrase "Bayesian Probability
Theorem" ring a bell?

-- 
       sentience@pobox.com      Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
          http://pobox.com/~sentience/beyond.html

Next message: Eugene Leitl: "RE: Charles Platt responds to Billy Brown on CryoNet Message #13281"
Previous message: Max More: "Messenger of Knowledge (the Internet in Indian villages)"
In reply to: Zero Powers: "Re: Clinton's National Nanotechnology Initiative"
Next in thread: Michael Wiik: "Re: Clinton's National Nanotechnology Initiative"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:04:20 MDT