redefining intelligence

From: Eugene Leitl (eugene.leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Mon Feb 28 2000 - 14:56:35 MST


John Calvin writes:
> Does this mean that the people who are intrested in contructing
> true AI are only interested in creating "Artificial
> mathematical/verbal abstract symbolic reasoning ability"? Or do they
> want the robot to dance as well?

Is a car understanding voice commands and navigating fully
autonomously in densest city traffic or a robot which need not be
painstakingly programmed to solve a given task not AI?

Symbolic algebra packages can reason fine enough, thank you. And I
don't look too forward too much to machines processing verbals, other
than speech input and machine translation.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:04:18 MDT