In a message dated 2/22/2000 12:49:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
rob@hbinternet.co.uk writes:
<< Again I see the magic word
"should" - the mark of a follower. What "should" I do? >>
'Yikes'! How untrue.
Should is not a following word, unless following your conscience is also a
bad thing.
Certainly we can and "should" weigh out the consequences of our actions. then
we can see what "should" happen if we take a foolish reactionary course. We
"chould" avoid actions that cause harm to ourselves and others. We "should"
think things though. We "should" take into account cause and effect qnd that
includes other people's reactions, advice and experience. No one person
makes me think, but many have taught me how.
<< My personal conclusion on this subject is the modify or banish idea. A
leader of a social order could put a question to an offending member - Be
modified or leave this society. If the individual had a problem with
modification, he can go - if not, then a simple painless modification would
surely be the best solution to the problem in hand.
What do you think about this?
>>
I think it's agood thing you are not in charge of how I think!!!!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:04:03 MDT