Robert Bradbury wrote:
>Zubrin has clearly done his homework and clearly makes a valid case for Mars
>being perhaps the first place we should go on a long term "occupation" basis.
>... Many of his economic arguments for colonizing Mars disappear if we even
>get minimal AI for human worker equivalence.
I'd be interested to see the best economic argument for colonizing Mars,
even assuming we never get AI. Seems a hard sell to me.
Btw, a recent Journal of Transhumanism article touched on this topic
(see http://www.transhumanist.com/volume4/space.htm )
Robin Hanson rhanson@gmu.edu http://hanson.gmu.edu
Asst. Prof. Economics, George Mason University
MSN 1D3, Carow Hall, Fairfax VA 22030
703-993-2326 FAX: 703-993-2323
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:04:02 MDT