Re: Mail Y2K bug?

• Next message: Max More: "Re: SOC/BIO: Frito-Lay campaign"
• Previous message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: META: Oh, no, not again."
• In reply to: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Mail Y2K bug?"
• Next in thread: m: "Re: Mail Y2K bug?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Lee Daniel Crocker wrote:

> > ...(OTOH, I can't find postings from
> > Lee Daniel Crocker because he won't fix his Y2K problem.)
>
> That's the first I've heard of a problem. I sent myself some
> test messages and all the dates appear correct. Is anyone else
> having a problem with my messages (other than content, that is:)?
> They're being sent from a server I own, so I can certainly fix
> whatever's wrong.

This was in your header:
Subject:
             Mail Y2K bug?
        Date:
             Thu, 17 Feb 100 09:05:36 -0800 (PST)

And the date in the message list in my Netscape Messenger reads: 12/31/69
19:00
as apparently thats as far back as Netscape can interpret date and time.
Being stuck in 1969 is not a bad thing...

Mike Lorrey

• Next message: Max More: "Re: SOC/BIO: Frito-Lay campaign"
• Previous message: Michael S. Lorrey: "Re: META: Oh, no, not again."
• In reply to: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Mail Y2K bug?"
• Next in thread: m: "Re: Mail Y2K bug?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:03:52 MDT