Re: Phenomenology [unintentional]

From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Sat Feb 12 2000 - 19:48:30 MST

Next message: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: hello again..."
Previous message: Ramez Naam: "RE: clones might not age faster after all"
In reply to: Joe E. Dees: "Re: Phenomenology [unintentional]"
Next in thread: Joe E. Dees: "Re: Phenomenology"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 01:55 AM 12/02/00 -0600, Mr Dees wrote:

>Interesting choice of critique, considering that intentionality is one
>of its (and phenomenology's) main themes.

Aww... jeez... now *if only I'd thought of that*... it would have been a
kind of... small joke...

< whimpering fade >

Damien

Next message: EvMick@aol.com: "Re: hello again..."
Previous message: Ramez Naam: "RE: clones might not age faster after all"
In reply to: Joe E. Dees: "Re: Phenomenology [unintentional]"
Next in thread: Joe E. Dees: "Re: Phenomenology"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:03:42 MDT