clones might not age faster after all

From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Sat Feb 12 2000 - 19:16:22 MST

Next message: Doug Jones: "Re: Y2K preparations/was Re: hello again..."
Previous message: Damien Broderick: "Re: Singularity information [was: Paths to the Singularity]"
Next in thread: Ramez Naam: "RE: clones might not age faster after all"
Maybe reply: Ramez Naam: "RE: clones might not age faster after all"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

http://www.newscientist.com/nsplus/insight/clone/clonesmaynot.html

Next message: Doug Jones: "Re: Y2K preparations/was Re: hello again..."
Previous message: Damien Broderick: "Re: Singularity information [was: Paths to the Singularity]"
Next in thread: Ramez Naam: "RE: clones might not age faster after all"
Maybe reply: Ramez Naam: "RE: clones might not age faster after all"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:03:42 MDT