Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
I find error in my post.
> To claim that the
> discussed bill provision (not necessarily the rest of the bill) does not
> violate the First Amendment is blatantly unconstitutional...
|_ oops, I mean "To claim that the discussed bill provision is constitutional is
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:03:09 MDT