Re: Essence Vital (was)Ahumans

Date: Sun Jan 23 2000 - 20:06:37 MST

In a message dated 1/23/2000 5:13:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, writes:

> From a physics standpoint, you have to argue that the rock has
> greater negentropy than the Mona Lisa. If the rock were created
> to serve as evidence that it came from Mars and demonstrated
> the existence of life on Mars a billion years ago, then I might
> grant the case, but if its trying to pass as an ordinary hunk
> of granite, I would disagree. >>

Why this obsolete obsession with the Mona Lisa? Anyone here have *any* other
concept of art? We are supposed to be futurists, if not at least up to date.
: )
always aMUSEd

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:02:37 MDT