Re: Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!

From: Edd111@aol.com
Date: Sat Jan 22 2000 - 13:35:55 MST

Next message: James Wetterau: "Re: decriminalizing drugs..."
Previous message: hal@finney.org: "Re: StockGeneration (was Re: [scam] $ pyramid scheme)"
Maybe in reply to: Terry Donaghe: "Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
Next in thread: Gina Miller: "Re: Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
Reply: Gina Miller: "Re: Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
Reply: Robert Bradbury: "Re: Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Point of reference: How many atoms wide is the head of a pin?

Next message: James Wetterau: "Re: decriminalizing drugs..."
Previous message: hal@finney.org: "Re: StockGeneration (was Re: [scam] $ pyramid scheme)"
Maybe in reply to: Terry Donaghe: "Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
Next in thread: Gina Miller: "Re: Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
Reply: Gina Miller: "Re: Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
Reply: Robert Bradbury: "Re: Lamest Definition of Nano - Ever!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:02:31 MDT