Re: PHIL: Justificationalism (Was: Dynamic Optimism as a tool inlogical reas...

Date: Sun Jan 16 2000 - 18:53:37 MST

In a message dated 1/16/2000 5:18:09 PM Pacific Standard Time, writes:

> A whole bunch of guys who take Hume's view on induction

You mean you don't?? Why not?
You certainly are not a mainstreamer in philosophy of science. I do not know
any scienctists who do not think that. Can you think of one? That
certainly is a new view. I have not heard that before. So, induction is no

Please state or rephrase this book reference so we can criticize your
interpretation and his conjectures <<H. W. B. Joseph's explanation of
induction in his _Introduction to Logic_ for a better solution to the
problem>>. Maybe this group (and I) will learn something.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:02:20 MDT