At 07:04 AM 01/01/2000 -0800, you wrote:
>--- chris abraham <chris@memes.org> wrote:
>> <!-- include 2001.party -->
>> At 2:10 AM -0500 1/1/00, m wrote:
>> > Some (inc. me) have argued this, but what's the
>> use?
>
><! excellent idea! >
>Exec 2001.party
><! Output=2 parties + everyone satisfied, maybe>
IAN: Ya, some people saw millennial accuracy as
a case against parting to the max last night. But
at this point, it means we have to party even
harder at the end of second millennium!! So now
it's a case for maximizing the party threshold!!
If anyone questions to case for maximal partying,
here's the low down from the US Naval Observatory:
http://psyche.usno.navy.mil/millennium/whenIs.html
http://aa.usno.navy.mil/AA/faq/docs/millennium.html
and also from the Royal Observatory in Greenwich:
http://www.rog.nmm.ac.uk/leaflets/new_mill.html
------------------------------------------------------------
GODDARD'S JOURNAL: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/journal.htm
____________________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:01:55 MDT